Spiritist Review - Journal of Psychological Studies - 1865

Allan Kardec

Back to the menu
Perispirit described in 1805

Extracted from the German book The mystical phenomena of human life
by Maximilien Perty, Professor at the University of Berne,
Leipzig and Heidelberg, 1861


Dr. Woetzel published a book with the title – Real apparition of my wife after her death – Chemnitz, 1804 that caused great sensation in the first years of this century. The author was attacked in several publications, particularly the Wieland that ridicules him in the Euthanasia. During his wife disease Woetzel had asked her that would come back and show up to him after her death. However, after a few weeks after her death a strong wind seemed to blow in the bedroom, although it was closed; the light was almost extinguished; a small window in the room opened and with the dimly lit ambient Woetzel saw the shape of his wife that told him in a sweet voice: Charles, I am immortal. One day we will meet again. The apparition and those reassuring words took place again later on. The woman showed up in a white dress with the appearance that she had before her death. The dog that had not moved during the first apparition was then agitated and moved around a circle as if going around a known person.

In a second work about the same subject (Leipzig, 1805) the author speaks of invitations that had been sent to him to belie the matter because otherwise many scientists would be forced to resign to what up until that moment they had considered like true and fair opinions and because superstition would find food for thought there. However, he had already requested the Council of the University of Leipzig to allow him to take a legal oath. The author develops his theory. According to him the soul, after death, would be surrounded by an ethereal, luminous body, through which it could become visible; that she could use other garments on top of that luminous envelope; that the apparition had not acted upon his interior feelings but exclusive upon the exterior senses.

As it can be seen the only missing word is perispirit. However, Woetzel is wrong when he believes that the apparition only acted upon the exterior senses and not onto the interior. Today we know that it is the opposite that happens. But he may have meant that he was awaken and not in a dreaming state that would have made him think that he had perceived the apparition only by the corporeal sight for he did not know the properties of the perispiritual fluid nor the mechanism of spiritual vision.

As a matter of fact, reading the scientific work of Mr. Pezzani about the Plurality of the existences one has the proof that the knowledge about the spiritual body goes back to the high antiquity and that only the name perispirit is modern. St. Paul described it in his first epistle to the Corinthians, chapter XV. Woetzel only recognized it by the force of the reasoning. Having studied them in the numerous facts that were observed, modern Spiritism described its properties and deduced the laws of its formation and manifestations.

With respect to the part that refers to the dog there is nothing special there. Several facts seem to demonstrate that certain animals feel the presence of the Spirits. In the Spiritist Review, June 1860 (The Spirit and the little dog) we cite an example that has remarkable analogy with that of Woetzel. It is not positively proven that they cannot see the Spirits. It would not be impossible that under certain circumstances, for example, the horses that show fear and adamantly refuse to move forward without an apparent reason may suffer the influence of a hidden influence.

A new egg from Saumur


As it seems, Saumur is prodigal in oviparous wonders. You may remember that in September last a chicken born in that city residing at Rue de Visitation laid miraculous eggs on which shells one could see perfectly embossed drawings of sacred object and inscriptions. That brought a great commotion to certain environments and excited the teasing vein of the nonbelievers.

The Echo Saumurois made a lot of fun out of the fact. The place was visited by crowds; law enforcement was touched by that and suggested that a policeman should watch the chicken waiting for the event. We will not repeat the witty and not less judicious explanation given by the Sauveur des Peuples, in Bordeaux, September 18th, 1864 to which we refer the readers for detailed description of the case.

Not long ago one of our subscribers from Saumur sent us another phenomenal egg originated in that town, asking us to have the bizarre thing carefully examined although it had no drawings or inscriptions. It is not that he believed in a prodigy but on the contrary, he wanted our opinion so that he could it to oppose people that were too credulous in matters of miracles because, as it seems, this had also produced a certain uproar in the public, following the previous series of events. We don’t know if it is from the same chicken. Here is what it is about: the egg shows an alteration at one end in the shape of a thick string, twisted around itself, with the same material of the shell, glued to the shell along its full extension of about 6 to 7 centimeters.

One only needs to understand the formation of eggs to realize the phenomenon. It is a known fact that the egg is formed out of a single membrane similar to a bowl in which the yoke and the white, embryo and food to the future chick. Some are sometimes laid in that state. Before the laying the membrane is covered by a layer of calcium carbonate that forms the shell. In the present case considering that the content was not enough to fill out the vesicular membrane resulted that the empty space forming the bowl contracted and wound itself around the body of the egg. The whole limestone body was hardened later on giving rise to the abnormal formation. It the whole space had been fulfilled the egg would be monstrous for a chicken egg because it would measure about 10 centimeters in its larger diameter whilst in the present case it has a regular dimension.



Which relationship can all that have with Spiritism? Absolutely none. The reason why we talk about the subject is for the fact that people wanted to involve the name of Spiritism in the first case and we don’t know exactly on which premises unless it was a follow up on their habit of looking for any opportunity to ridicule Spiritism, even with the strangest things. We wanted to demonstrate once more that the Spiritists are not as much credulous as they say. If a rare event occurs they seek the explanation in the tangible word, before anything else, and do not mix the Spirits with everything that is extraordinary since they know the limits and the laws that govern their actions.

Related articles

Show related items